Asus PRIME Z690-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive474% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-A  (all builds)
Memory88.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 03:32
Run Duration388 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 216
2-Core 377
118% 224 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1473
137% 1,143 Pts
64-Core 2,868
178% 2,868 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3790
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.6
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.30
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 157
Parallax 113
104% 133 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 105
Splatting 90
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
604GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3460 2015 1946 1931 1954 1980 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
474% Outstanding
Read 3,001
Write 3,533
Mixed 3,216
SusWrite 2,214
675% 2991 MB/s
4K Read 90.9
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 135
452% 164 MB/s
DQ Read 1,994
DQ Write 1,521
DQ Mixed 1733
1,303% 1,749 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 474%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
671GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3191 3186 3189 3192 3203 3195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
507% Outstanding
Read 2,610
Write 3,202
Mixed 2,920
SusWrite 3,193
675% 2,981 MB/s
4K Read 76.8
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 114
386% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 2,250
DQ Write 1,705
DQ Mixed 1936
1,459% 1,964 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 507%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
431GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 487 487 418 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 486
Mixed 460
SusWrite 444
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 60
207% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
LSI 9650SE-4LPML 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 104 101 104 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 610
Write 100
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 104
45% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 1.2
50% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 2
5% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 102%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
648GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3192 3196 3194 2402 1515 1519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
481% Outstanding
Read 2,839
Write 3,185
Mixed 2,964
SusWrite 2,503
649% 2,873 MB/s
4K Read 80.5
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 122
409% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 2245
DQ Write 1,696
DQ Mixed 1925
1,452% 1,955 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 481%
Great: 477%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 101 97 99 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 51.7
Write 56.4
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 98.6
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
197% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548C38-32 KF548C38-16 KF548C38-32 KF548C38-16 95GB
4000, 4000, 4000, 4000 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
140% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 51.7
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 49.4
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z690-A Builds (Compare 7,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback