Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '17 at 16:17
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 127 56% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 401 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 282B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 32.2 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 36.8 26% 32.6 fps	MRender 40.2 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 32.5 30% 37 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 120GB-$130 2,462 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 7701 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1886 (A6) Unknown 100 100 322 (A7) Unknown 100 100 18 (A8) Unknown 100 100 535 (A9) Unknown 100 100 139 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 418 (AE) Unknown 100 100 85 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 121 519691632665 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 3421 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 54263 (F1) Unknown 253 253 30490 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5423 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	57.2% Above average	Read 419 Write 273 Mixed 311 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 13.1 75% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 50.5 35% 42 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 101%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 205GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 128 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2459 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7863 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1876 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1946 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 131 131 207977 (C2) HDA temperature 117 102 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.4% Excellent	Read 151 Write 136 Mixed 111 99% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.21 95% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 992099 (997099) 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.4% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.1 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $638

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16