Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision M6800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0CF0TC
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 16:28
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 196
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 469
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3100M
Dell(1028 15CD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8908
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 15.6
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 13.3
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 953
Write 828
Mixed 570
174% 784 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 35.5
127% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 366
280% 376 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 313%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
466GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 444
Mixed 388
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 42
136% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Corsair Voyager GT 3.0 248GB
101GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.6
Write 16.2
Mixed 18.3
23% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.4
94% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-101.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback