Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-7048A-T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7048A-T  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 568
52% 438 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.3
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 456 384 346 347 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 475
Mixed 421
SusWrite 390
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 49.1
160% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
637GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 37.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 40
51% 39 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown(date:17/19) 9965589-029.D01G(date:17/18) 9965589-029.D01G 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.6% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 19.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SYS-7048A-T Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro SYS-7048A-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback