Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JAU
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 18:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 7.1
6% 6.5 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM128GDJTNG-831 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 182 181 182 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 803
Write 310
Mixed 425
SusWrite 186
95% 431 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 48.4
170% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 222
202% 303 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback