Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 622
65% 520 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255
CLim: 2152 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 118
Parallax 123
106% 124 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 101
Splatting 87.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300. 960GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 367 247 121 264 274 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 486
Mixed 384
SusWrite 250
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 38.6
138% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 196
187% 292 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 103%
WD Re 2TB-$50
294GB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 115
Write 115
Mixed 101
SusWrite 79.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLOH22F-18---------- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback