Supermicro C7H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C7H61  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7H61
Memory12.8 GB free of 16.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 01:11
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 83.8
45% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 111
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 39.3
35% 41.2 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 28.1
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 240 271 324 329 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 279
Write 270
Mixed 301
SusWrite 277
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 12.9
60% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 120
106% 160 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 MXIC 25L Series 16GB
1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7H61 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback