Today's hottest deals

Asus X202E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X202E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X202E
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Memory 48.6
1-Core 19
2-Core 38.6
25% 35.4 Pts
4-Core 40.3
8-Core 47.2
6% 43.8 Pts
64-Core 56.5
4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 108D) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.4
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 73 82 82 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20% Poor
Read 66.6
Write 97
Mixed 102
SusWrite 77.8
20% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.2
28% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 84.9
65% 89 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 20%
Great: 83%
SDXC Card 1TB
979GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 8
13% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X202E Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X202E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback