Today's hottest deals

Asus M70AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M70AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M70AD
Memory5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 14:41
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 53
2-Core 95.2
44% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 145
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Gigabyte(1458 3518) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 1.7
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.8
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 81 94 85 103 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 125
Write 112
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 86.7
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 88%
Hitachi Touro Mobile 3.0 500GB
327GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 36 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 33.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 35.8
24% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G 0112 78.C1GET.CP10C 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M70AD Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M70AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback