To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190117
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 07:23
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 164
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 397
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 57
Parallax 37.4
30% 43.9 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 43.4
42% 51.8 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0328A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 101 1.5 4.4 63 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 347
Write 285
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 43
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
1% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
74GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 75 74 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 60.2
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 76.1
39% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
307GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 86 87 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 85.1
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
124% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown lanshuo 0DB0- 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback