Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G4 WKS TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 WKS TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E0
Memory2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 12:14
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 726
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 12BC) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 19.6
18% 22.9 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 0.2
11% 15.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 73 14 9.9 148 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,260
Write 302
Mixed 108
SusWrite 78.3
94% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 43.5
132% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 212
202% 313 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 113%
Great: 203%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
137GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 418 441 443 431 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 444
Mixed 316
SusWrite 433
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 30.5
102% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 170
175% 287 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 118%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
688GB free
Firmware: P9CR309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 1015 64 56 658 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,770
Mixed 1,532
SusWrite 373
291% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 38
129% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 375
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 140%
Great: 394%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
664GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 176 175 171 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 173
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
223GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 141 139 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 132
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 139
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
165GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 40.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 41.6
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 26.9
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 WKS TWR Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 WKS TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback