Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory20.9 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '17 at 23:49
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5530
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 127
50% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 457
43% 357 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.03
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 6.74
5% 5.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 258
Write 228
Mixed 223
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 14.6
64% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 52.3
64% 112 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
930GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 127
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.41
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 1TB
156GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 27.6
Mixed 24.8
35% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.24
65% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 43%
USB Flash Memory 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 6.82
Mixed 11.3
15% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.97
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.03
20% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback