PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110929 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '22 at 17:29 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 347 352 397 392 388 MB/s
|
77%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
930GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 118 117 117 117 MB/s
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-1600C9-4GAO F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-1600C9-4GAO 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 352x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 124x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $150Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 53x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 58x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 57x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $463 |