Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1814

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT80S 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1814  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 17:48
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 184
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 466
52% 407 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
MSI(1462 1171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 49.4
71% 64.1 fps
MRender 55
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 45.5
40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1067
Write 1,078
Mixed 163
170% 770 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 14.6
76% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 96.5
130% 253 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
86GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 354
Mixed 390
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 25.1
89% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 116
114% 190 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
AI Mass Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24
Write 10.2
Mixed 6.8
14% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1814 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-1814

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback