To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 11:02
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 178
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 515
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.5% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 76.4
47% 63.9 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 40.6
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL250GB-D8 250GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 101 133 106 104 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,125
Mixed 954
SusWrite 193
208% 934 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 33.1
137% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 467
357% 483 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 134%
Great: 199%
MLD M700 NVMe SSD 1TB
748GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2108 1972 2223 2304 2103 1100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,536
Write 1,844
Mixed 1,623
SusWrite 1,968
395% 1,743 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 46.2
158% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 551
407% 538 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 254%
Great: 461%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 23.8
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 16.3
14% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-046.A 99U5403-065.A 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.1% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 22.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback