Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171113
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 19:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 81.6
49% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 98
13% 99.1 Pts
64-Core 81.9
5% 81.9 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2111) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 168 127 54 3.1 4.1 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 201
Write 190
Mixed 185
SusWrite 67
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 0.4
48% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
16% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 92%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
161GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 54 57 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 61.1
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 56.7
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
D3L16S28MP-4G-ACER Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback