Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UAR
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 01:41
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 62.1
33% 51 Pts
4-Core 77.8
8-Core 75.7
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 74.4
5% 74.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1311) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.3
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6.8
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aarvex 512GB SSD 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 128 234 230 220 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 349
Write 246
Mixed 279
SusWrite 193
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 14.1
54% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 50.5
56% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback