Lenovo 2356W2P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 2356W2P  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2356W2P
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 10:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 126
57% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 179
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5200M
Legend(17AA 2200) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8908
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.2
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.9
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 100 91 101 101 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 358
Write 351
Mixed 224
SusWrite 102
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 16.4
64% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 32.7
54% 106 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2356W2P Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2356W2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback