Lenovo 4524RL2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4524RL2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 08 '17 at 07:12
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$87
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 469
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 412
Mixed 420
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 42
145% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 129
111% 171 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 134%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 90.9
141% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.27
89% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 65.4
126% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
930GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.8% Above average
Read 134
Write 139
Mixed 97.6
156% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.25
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.35
104% 1.39 MB/s
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
930GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
Read 133
Write 136
Mixed 98
155% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.35
110% 1.43 MB/s
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB
465GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
151% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 148
193% 151 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 15.6
1,622% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 15.7
1,979% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 151%
Great: 234%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB
465GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
151% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 150
194% 151 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 15.8
1,629% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 40.8
DQ Mixed 15.7
2,017% 27.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524RL2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524RL2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback