Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 179
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 708
63% 533 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600M
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.21023.1015
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 84.8
Reflection 130
Parallax 173
69% 129 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 87.2
Splatting 152
116% 142 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM2OA57A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 20 39 47 22 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 32.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 31.2
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 50%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
90GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 84 88 85 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 126
Write 111
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 86
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.6% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback