Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 19:39
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 199
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 520
47% 397 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 49%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 153 156 160 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 496
Write 448
Mixed 420
SusWrite 156
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 44.2
144% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 173
173% 281 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 128%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
245GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 102 96 53 83 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 366
Write 218
Mixed 276
SusWrite 98.9
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 19.3
88% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 0.2
59% 139 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
116GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 115 117 119 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 97.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 116
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 0830 500GB
67GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 60 60 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 50
Write 49.5
Mixed 36
SusWrite 59.1
66% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
92GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 47 22 35 33 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 57.3
Write 58.1
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 29.4
58% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback