Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B560M GAMING HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M GAMING HD  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 06:30
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6400
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 177
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 310
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 3
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 667 321 326 333 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,089
Write 910
Mixed 954
SusWrite 473
192% 857 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 46.2
167% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 568
418% 554 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 148%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLLF62F-C6---------- 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M GAMING HD Builds (Compare 1,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M GAMING HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback