Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8770E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 50 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Memory 14.9 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 70.8 24% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 134 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 30FD) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 9.8 5% 7.6 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7 5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 298 304 303 308 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 775 Write 676 Mixed 398 SusWrite 321 121% 542 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 31.4 97% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 203 152% 207 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 360 11% 360 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
PRO A10-8770E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 40%, 50 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	3x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	2x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC AXIOM MEMORY 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 5 samples	1x