Today's hottest deals

GX55 GX55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGX55 GX55  (all builds)
MotherboardGX55 GX55
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 19:58
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 92.7
35% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 51.2
12% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 63.7
4% 63.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.7
1% 1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anucell 128GB 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0521A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 472 202 190 77 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 1,012
Write 684
Mixed 651
SusWrite 244
144% 648 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 11.1
84% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 124
94% 123 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 112%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: T0824A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 244 110 144 170 232 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 8G 2400 Crucial CB8GS2666.C8ET 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.4
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GX55 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: GX55 GX55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback