Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80SR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80SR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5A1
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160830
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 22:34
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 89.9
44% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 74.1
15% 100 Pts
64-Core 72.6
4% 72.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3824) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 7.2
4% 7.3 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 18 13 14 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 31.6
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 15
14% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 70%
Seagate One Touch w/PW 2TB
348GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 23 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 25
18% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
415GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.7 11 12 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB M471A1K43BB1-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SR Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback