Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 833A
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 13:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 173
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 248
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 833A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 7
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 63 5.5 22 85 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 406
Write 342
Mixed 285
SusWrite 86
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 15.9
53% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 45.2
47% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4162CAB1G4HB1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-bs0xx Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $47
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback