Today's hottest deals

Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1176 x 664 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190219
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 12:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 176
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 251
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 123 127 130 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 206
Write 122
Mixed 143
SusWrite 127
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 7
72% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 15.9
51% 109 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
382GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 142 146 147 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 145
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback