Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime18.4 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 03:08
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 94.7
51% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 224
25% 198 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Dell(1028 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 20.3
16% 20 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 18.5
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 302 339 258 236 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 308
Write 235
Mixed 323
SusWrite 271
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 20.8
77% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 271
197% 256 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback