Lenovo 20MAS01600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20MAS01600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MAS01600
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220323
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 118
59% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 151
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 14 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 609 378 434 379 756 975 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 1,090
Write 946
Mixed 872
SusWrite 589
196% 874 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 20.6
111% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 261
181% 228 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 122%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE M471A1K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20MAS01600 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20MAS01600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback