Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemSamsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350E7C-S07FR
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '22 at 08:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 116
58% 91 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 154
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 104 89 78 50 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62% Good
Read 459
Write 289
Mixed 306
SusWrite 68.7
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 32
107% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 113
91% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8502 PSD34G16002S 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3 Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback