Today's hottest deals

Asus X550VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VC
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 57
2-Core 95.6
42% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 122
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hi-level Ultra Series 240GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 230 224 108 54 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 318
Write 298
Mixed 195
SusWrite 151
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 6.3
46% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 13.9
51% 112 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Kingston 99U5428-053.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550VC Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback