HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 27.6
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 184
46% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 241
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8299) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 0
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900211
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 160
Write 67.5
Mixed 93.2
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 5.9
31% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 74.5
DQ Write 87.9
DQ Mixed 63
52% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
154GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.2
Write 104
Mixed 57.5
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16
Write 0.7
Mixed 3
6% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF M378A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback