Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 31.6 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 136 44% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 195 23% 179 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 58%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3402101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 311 130 247 105 114 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.9% Average	Read 187 Write 179 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 198 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 9.8 49% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 41.4 76% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5663-004.A00G 2x16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 19.7 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 245 16% 245 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	899x
GeForce 940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 7,286 samples	296x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	213x

SSD
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples	65x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	63x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	36x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 13,568 samples	221x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	80x
ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 2,395 samples	71x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16