Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 23:37
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 120
52% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 299
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 51.2
46% 56.6 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 48.4
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1127 1212 1167 1170 1162 1150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,912
Write 1,760
Mixed 1,483
SusWrite 1,165
355% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 51.8
172% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 651
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 515
382% 512 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 224%
Great: 329%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 373 384 420 425 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 393
Write 366
Mixed 391
SusWrite 387
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 29.2
99% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 232
178% 241 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT16G4SFS8266.C8FB 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback