Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 45.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 289
83% 163 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 653
74% 578 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 26.2
13% 19.8 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 20
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09787
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 408 370 141 92 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 415
Write 432
Mixed 365
SusWrite 244
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 39
134% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 226
167% 220 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2376 2292 2279 2310 2304 2306 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-2666SC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 25
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback