HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory185.9 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '22 at 04:03
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6138
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 61.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 165
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 659
58% 492 Pts
64-Core 3,512
217% 3,512 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.19
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Good
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 71.7
61% 75 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 70.8
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 795 618 622 619 619 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,200
Write 1,986
Mixed 1,515
SusWrite 846
366% 1,637 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 70.2
233% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 801
596% 796 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 247%
Great: 284%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
332GB free
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1823 901 613 613 615 612 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,221
Write 1964
Mixed 1,533
SusWrite 863
368% 1,645 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72.6
250% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 808
602% 804 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 255%
Great: 284%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
386GB free
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1812 904 610 613 612 611 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,223
Write 1,902
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 860
364% 1,630 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 71.8
243% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1093
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 1,013
761% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 262%
Great: 284%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
453GB free
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1843 884 614 618 617 618 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,129
Write 1,937
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 866
363% 1,623 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 71.3
237% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 930
700% 942 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 254%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1 12x16GB
12 of 24 slots used
192GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 64.4
MC Write 51.1
MC Mixed 83.3
189% 66.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 156%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback