Biostar H510MX/E 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MX/E 2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 10:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 589
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.5% Excellent
Lighting 87.5
Reflection 135
Parallax 167
71% 130 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 157
119% 145 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN010754
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 378 352 406 409 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 423
Write 354
Mixed 383
SusWrite 332
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 33.9
103% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 150
127% 179 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
52GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 53 51 52 52 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 52.4
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 53.9
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1127CS.006 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MX/E 2.0 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H510MX/E 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback