Samsung P580

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung P580  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG P580
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100426
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 01:54
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 46.7
33% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 74.5
8-Core 81.4
10% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 83.5
5% 83.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C075) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.9
2% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0729A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 101 163 169 101 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 145
Write 141
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 119
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 6.5
26% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 14.3
14% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 91%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 128GB
119GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 50.3
Write 21.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 23.1
36% 30 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 4.1
163% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 533 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P580 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung P580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback