Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3060 2,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Memory 20.1 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 26.1 14% 22 Pts	4-Core 28.1 8-Core 28.8 4% 28.5 Pts	64-Core 29.5 2% 29.5 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 821D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 122 130 142 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 128 68% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S AMD R534G1601S1S 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 320 12% 320 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron J3060IntelBench 22%, 2,183 samples	2x
Pentium J3710IntelBench 27%, 2,453 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	4x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	1x
AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GBAdataBench 22%, 928 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16