Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C55t-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55t-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F5
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150730
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 24.9
1-Core 3.8
2-Core 11.4
10% 13.4 Pts
4-Core 16.7
8-Core 21.3
2% 19 Pts
64-Core 23.7
2% 23.7 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 2.2
0% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P3M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 48 53 42 33 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 4.7
Write 29.6
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 38.8
15% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.9% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55t-C Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55t-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback