Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F8
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160328
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	May 20 '18 at 21:42
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2830 10,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 44.4 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 21.6 21% 27.3 Pts	4-Core 35.1 8-Core 32.1 5% 33.6 Pts	64-Core 37.5 2% 37.5 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 F840) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 871GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX1P4M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1691 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 30351 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4309 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2442 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2121 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 59 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 39826 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219043921957 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 91 91 3845 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 175 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	51.8% Above average	Read 79.9 Write 101 Mixed 72 63% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.17 55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GB 714 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.1 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	193x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	84x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	51x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	272x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	86x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	42x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	15x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	76x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330