Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 08:46
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700F-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 198
2-Core 393
116% 224 Pts
4-Core 771
8-Core 1,443
132% 1,107 Pts
64-Core 2,250
139% 2,250 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 113%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 119
Parallax 139
109% 130 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 103
Splatting 85.2
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 753 4.6 420 69 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,071
Write 1,213
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 408
210% 934 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 71.8
300% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 1,188
DQ Mixed 669
574% 824 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 199%
Great: 226%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
179GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 541 541 541 542 593 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,618
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,199
SusWrite 581
276% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 97.9
337% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 766
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 304
338% 575 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 237%
Great: 277%
Apacer AS350 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 422 418 424 424 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 404
Mixed 381
SusWrite 422
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 24.1
125% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 37.3
82% 163 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
370GB free
Firmware: CT100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 77 76 78 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 73.2
Write 87.1
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 79
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$63
149GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 45 43 48 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 50.6
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 44.9
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 40%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 39.4
Mixed 37
SusWrite 40.2
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
267% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3467 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.5% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 9,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4 - $222

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback