Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop S5402ZA_S5402ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop S5402ZA_S5402ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK S5402ZA
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220908
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 24.7
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 143
38% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 448
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1F42) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1368
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 16.9
10% 15.5 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 12.8
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 879 761 754 679 897 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 462
Mixed 703
SusWrite 790
136% 599 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 26.8
95% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 125
99% 138 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 102%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FR 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 288
14% 288 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop S5402ZA_S5402ZA Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop S5402ZA_S5402ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback