Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 17:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 156
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 430
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1651 MHz, MLim: 2075 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 128
Parallax 114
95% 119 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 111
Splatting 98.8
87% 107 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 208 214 215 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 233
Write 200
Mixed 206
SusWrite 190
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 17.8
90% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 20.9
25% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KBL78B452G21H920 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F 8502 PSD34G133381 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MP-S/-V/H67MP Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Foxconn H67MP-S/-V/H67MP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback