Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 135
2-Core 251
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 324
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 26.5
15% 20.5 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 20.8
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 50 29 24 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 448
Write 447
Mixed 112
SusWrite 39.8
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 28.9
113% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 74.7
61% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8G 2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback