Terrans T700X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTerrans T700X  (all builds)
MotherboardTerrans T700X-CFL
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 19:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 39.4
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 46.5
24% 36.7 Pts
4-Core 94.2
8-Core 255
20% 174 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 67C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 3.2
2% 32.5 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IM2S3338-256GD 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0106A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 125 87 83 74 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 351
Write 346
Mixed 334
SusWrite 105
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.9
40% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 84.7
78% 122 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
790GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 16.4
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 26.7
12% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P26KC8T1-BPXS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical T700X Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Terrans T700X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback