Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 67% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 262 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 712 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 931 58% 931 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 36,301 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.26.08 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 17 Parallax 26.9 15% 20.6 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 20.5 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D256 256GB 2,132 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: BS262 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1446 Write 1,068 Mixed 905 252% 1,140 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 18.6 84% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 689 DQ Write 713 DQ Mixed 464 414% 622 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 159%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD4S3200J4G22-B Smart Brazil 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.8% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 17.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 17.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 12%, 36,301 samples	238x

SSD
CL1-4D256 256GBSsstcBench 118%, 2,132 samples	164x
IM2P33F4 256GBNvmeBench 136%, 233 samples	15x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	14x

RAM
Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Brazil 8GBSmartBench 67%, 147 samples	72x
Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Adata 4JQA-0622AC 8GBSmartBench 65%, 50 samples	22x
AD4S3200J4G22-B Smart Brazil 8GBAdataBench 66%, 50 samples	21x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16