Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 169 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 462 50% 397 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 2186) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.01% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.01% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 459 Write 285 Mixed 378 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 30.4 98% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 234 177% 244 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 507GB free Firmware: 00.0NA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 93 96 93 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 93.1 Write 87.3 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 93.8 61% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 15.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GBMicronBench 52%, 3 samples	1x
CT102464BA160B.C16 Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 12GBUnknownBench 29%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $356