HP 500-223w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP 500-223w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 17:09
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 160
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 482
52% 412 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 86.8
52% 70.8 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 73
Splatting 47
49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Indmem mSata 1TB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1014A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 409 422 438 442 439 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.2% Excellent
Read 305
Write 315
Mixed 269
SusWrite 422
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 22.7
112% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 31.6
79% 159 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-223w Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-223w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback