MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 01:45
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 255
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 811
79% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 203
Parallax 177
144% 185 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 171
Splatting 130
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
113GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 929
Write 899
Mixed 866
201% 898 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 36.2
127% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 156
179% 305 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 148%
Great: 182%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,970
Write 965
Mixed 1,309
312% 1,414 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 54.1
210% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 227
227% 368 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 221%
Great: 243%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSA.8FARG BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41.5
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 22.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback